Couch v. Commission on Ethics

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant had waived his right to challenge recommended order's findings of fact because he did not file exceptions to hearing officer's findings of fact
• holding that appellant had waived his right to challenge the recommended order’s findings of fact because he did not file exceptions to the hearing officer’s findings of fact
• failure to file exceptions precludes a party from arguing a version of the facts different from those approved in the final order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).