Cotz v. Mastroeni

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “clearly had probable cause to believe that plaintiff was being disruptive and to remove plaintiff from the polls”
• holding that verbal harassment and threats, regardless of how inappropriate, unprofessional or reprehensible, do not violate a federally protected right and are not cognizable under section 1983
• “Polling places clearly are non-public fora and voters present are subject to various First Amendment restrictions, including those based on content.”
• “Polling places clearly are non-public fora and voters present are subject to various First Amendment restrictions, including those based on content.”
• “Polling places clearly are non-public fora and voters present are subject to various First Amendment restrictions, including those based on content.”
• granting summary judgment against plaintiff offered only “unsubstantiated allegations” and “no medical evidence to substantiate or further elaborate her allegations” of having two herniated discs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).