Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that trial court has broad discretion “in controlling the interrogation of witnesses and the presentation of evidence”
• reasoning that the Court need not consider if unsightliness alone was sufficient to constitute nuisance because the case at issue involved more than mere unsightliness
• reasoning that the Court need not consider if unsightliness alone was sufficient to constitute nuisance because the case at issue involved more than mere unsightliness
• noting that party may not have standing to sue in name of their business because they failed to register its name pursuant to requirements of 11 V.S.A. § 1621
• noting that award of damages for nuisance “can properly include both compensation for the lost use of property . . . and compensation for personal injuries such as annoyance, discomfort, and inconvenience”
• noting that award of damages for nuisance “can properly include both compensation for the lost use of property . . . and compensation for personal injuries such as annoyance, discomfort, and inconvenience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).