Skip to main content
· 3/18/2004

Cottrell, Inc. v. Williams

Citations

  • 266 Ga. App. 357
  • 596 S.E.2d 789
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1067
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding durational and dispositional departure sentence for conviction of attempted second-degree murder because no abuse of discretion
  • discussing objectives of the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act and concluding those goals provide guidance in determining whether reasons justifying departure are substantial and compelling
  • issue of whether departure factors are substantial and compelling is a question of law and should be reviewed de novo
  • differences in prior convictions not reflected in sentencing grid one of many factors supporting departure
  • defendant's youth could not be mitigating factor for sentencing purposes because legislature omitted it from nonexclusive list but specifically included victim's youth in nonexclusive list of aggravating factors
  • defendant’s age, standing alone, cannot serve as substantial and compelling reason; district court may consider age “as part of the entire package” and in context of defendant’s relative immaturity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.