COTTRELL Et Al. v. ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a claim that an intergovernmental agreement between two Georgia governmental entities was void because it “requirefd one of the entities] to reimburse ... a private company”
• where purpose of bonds was to fund a portion of the cost of developing, constructing, and operating a new stadium facility in Atlanta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).