Cottonwood Financial Ltd. v. Cash Store Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering \marks that lack[ed] incontestable status as functionally incontestable\ when the plaintiff had \obtained incontestable status for various iterations of the mark\ \Cash Store\
• adopting UCC definition of “goods” for Lanham Act
• “Stocks, like other securities, are not goods.”
• “Stocks, like other securities, are not goods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).