Skip to main content
· 5/9/2003

Cottonwood Affordable Housing v. Yavapai County

Citations

  • 72 P.3d 357
  • 205 Ariz. 427
  • 402 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
  • 2003 Ariz. Tax LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that LIHTCs “are not income flowing from the rental of the property”
  • determining rental restrictions must be taken into account when assessing \full cash value or fair market value\ in Arizona because they \have a significant impact on the value of the property\
  • “the restrictions imposed under the LIHTC program . . . must be taken into account” in valuing property
  • “the restrictions imposed under the LIHTC program . . . must be taken into account” in valuing property
  • tax credits are nontaxable intangibles
  • tax credits are nontaxable intangibles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul A. Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.