Skip to main content

Cotton v. State

Citations

  • 658 N.E.2d 898
  • 1995 Ind. LEXIS 182
  • 1995 WL 737423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court's nunc pro tunc entries were supported by sufficient written memorials and that they served \to make the record speak the truth\
  • holding that the trial court’s nunc pro tunc entries were Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A-CR-1282 | January 15, 2021 Page 6 of 7 supported by sufficient written memorials and that they served “to make the record speak the truth”
  • sequential ordering of CCS entries \ordinarily reflects the actual point at which the entries ... were made\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.