Cotton v. PrivateBank and Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nothing in the Act or regulations prohibits the disclosure of the underlying factual documents which may cause a bank to submit a SAR. Furthermore, those underlying documents do not become confidential by reason of being attached or described in a SAR.”
• “Documents which give rise to suspicious 22 conduct . . . are to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery because they are business 23 records made in the ordinary course of business”
• “Documents which give rise to suspicious 3 conduct . . . are to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery because they are business 4 records made in the ordinary course of business”
• \documents which give rise to suspicious 18 conduct . . . are to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery because they are business 19 records made in the ordinary course of business\
• \documents which give rise to suspicious 7 conduct . . . are to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery because they are business 8 records made in the ordinary course of business\
• “Documents which give rise to suspicious 14 conduct . . . are to be produced in the ordinary course of discovery because they are business 15 records made in the ordinary course of business”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).