Cotton v. Consolidation Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding plaintiff’s allegation of “serious on and off the job stress, severely affecting his relationship with his wife and family members” was insufficient to allege severe emotional distress in the context of a claim for negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress
• holding the trial court did not err by dismissing the plaintiff’s REDA claim because the plaintiff only spoke to his supervisors about his concerns and failed to file any type of complaint or report his concerns regarding occupational health and safety to the company’s ethics hotline
• “We do not believe that Plaintiff’s complaint, alleging that Defendant ‘falsely contended’ that Plaintiff ‘falsified his time card,’ or reported Plaintiff to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission sets forth a cause of action for libel per se sufficient to survive Defendants’ Rule 12(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).