Cottle v. Mankin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the “serious harm” test to determine whether good cause existed for foregoing the notice and comment process
• noting a distinction between technical errors in an agency's notice and comment procedures and an agency's \utter failure\ to comply with notice and comment requirements
• \Any suggestion that the postpromulgation comments to the Interim Rule can satisfy [the purposes of notice-and-comment rulemaking] misses the point.\ (internal citation omitted)
• “[S]ome uncertainty follows the enactment of any law that provides the agency with administrative responsibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).