N.D. California· 4/7/2016
Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.
Citations
- 176 F. Supp. 3d 930
- 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 499
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50579
- 2016 WL 1394236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying 15 preliminary approval of a $12.25 million settlement after extensive analysis of the 16 method used to calculate the settlement value
- explaining 14 that counsel had drastically undervalued a claim because outdated information with an open class 15 period was used
- finding 16 problematic, among other things, the “seemingly arbitrary reduction of [the PAGA] penalty to a 17 miniscule portion of the settlement amount – $ 122,250, which is less than one percent of the 18 total”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chhabria
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 1,381×
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John aThird Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-06-23· cited 615×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1982-09-21· cited 337×
- Class v. City of SeattleNinth Circuit· 1992-02-04· cited 325×
- National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. Directv, Inc.C.D. California· 2004-01-05· cited 304×
- In Re Tableware Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2007-04-12· cited 198×
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-11· cited 181×
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2015-09-28· cited 177×
- Brock v. Superior Care, Inc.Second Circuit· 1988-04-05· cited 140×
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-07-14· cited 87×
- Burlingham v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-04-30· cited 62×
- Petroleum Pipe Americas Corp. v. Jindal Saw, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 45×
- In re National Football League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-01-14· cited 41×
- Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.N.D. California· 2014-08-07· cited 22×
- Cotter v. Lyft, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-03-11· cited 21×
- Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLCC.D. California· 2016-01-22· cited 17×
- Edwards v. First American Corp.C.D. California· 2012-11-30· cited 10×
- Narayan v. EGL, Inc.N.D. California· 2012-09-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.