Skip to main content
· 12/3/1919

Cottam v. Oregon Short Line R.

Citations

  • 55 Utah 330
  • 187 P. 827
  • 1919 Utah LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if we include the eleven days that [plaintiff] spent in SHU before the disciplinary hearing with the ninety days he received as part of his penalty, the duration of his confinement was neither atypical nor significant”
  • “Even if we include the eleven days that Borcsok spent in the SHU [Special Housing Unit] before the disciplinary hearing with the ninety days he received as part of his penalty, the duration of his confinement was neither atypical nor significant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corfman, Frick, Gideon, Thurman, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.