N.D. California· 2/24/2010
Cota v. Maxwell-Jolly
Citations
- 688 F. Supp. 2d 980
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22975
- 2010 WL 693256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering, prior to certification, the harm to putative class members from reductions in Medicaid services but not discussing the appropriateness of such consideration
- “[T]he reduction or elimination of pub- lic medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
- “[T]he reduction or elimination of public medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
- “The disparate impact occasioned by such requirements ... on a particular class of disabled persons is sufficient to demonstrate a violation of section 35.130(b)(3).”
- “[T]he reduction or elimination of public medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
- “[T]he reduction or elimination of pub- lic medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaFourth Circuit· 2013-03-05· cited 399×
- M.R. v. DreyfusNinth Circuit· 2011-12-16· cited 180×
- WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangN.D. California· 2019-03-22· cited 35×
- Dunn v. DunnM.D. Alabama· 2016-09-09· cited 14×
- Strouchler v. ShahS.D. New York· 2012-09-04· cited 12×
- Tamara v. El Camino HospitalN.D. California· 2013-08-02· cited 11×
- Dunakin v. QuigleyW.D. Washington· 2015-04-10· cited 10×
- Schwarz v. Villages Charter School, Inc.M.D. Florida· 2016-02-29· cited 3×
- M. R. v. Susan DreyfusNinth Circuit· 2012-06-18
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,320×
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 721×
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 598×
- Sherrie Lynn Zukle v. The Regents of the University of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1999-02-23· cited 359×
- Vernon Crowder Stephanie Good v. Yukio Kitagawa, Chairman, Board of Agriculture, State of Hawaii Calvin LumNinth Circuit· 1996-04-30· cited 171×
- Boyd v. City and County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 2009-08-07· cited 139×
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. ReyNinth Circuit· 2009-08-13· cited 133×
- Fisher v. Oklahoma Health Care AuthorityTenth Circuit· 2003-07-15· cited 131×
- Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-JollyNinth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 94×
- Watson v. WeeksNinth Circuit· 2006-02-08· cited 90×
- Levi Townsend v. Lyle Quasim, Secretary of the State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services (Dshs)Ninth Circuit· 2003-05-01· cited 88×
- Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. ShewryNinth Circuit· 2008-09-17· cited 88×
- Estate of Martin v. California Department of Veterans AffairsNinth Circuit· 2009-03-26· cited 87×
- AlohaCare v. Hawaii, Department of Human ServicesNinth Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 63×
- Conlan v. Bonta'California Court of Appeal· 2002-10-29· cited 41×
- Beltran v. MyersNinth Circuit· 1982-05-25· cited 39×
- United States v. McCalebNinth Circuit· 2009-01-13· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.