Cota v. Maxwell-Jolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, prior to certification, the harm to putative class members from reductions in Medicaid services but not discussing the appropriateness of such consideration
• “[T]he reduction or elimination of pub- lic medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
• “[T]he reduction or elimination of public medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
• “The disparate impact occasioned by such requirements ... on a particular class of disabled persons is sufficient to demonstrate a violation of section 35.130(b)(3).”
• “[T]he reduction or elimination of public medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”
• “[T]he reduction or elimination of pub- lic medical benefits is sufficient to establish irreparable harm to those likely to be affected by the program cuts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).