Cota v. Eyman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring arbitration of a tortious interference with contract claim because “the dispute over the termination of the contracts and exercise of the security agreements involved factual issues arising in connection with the contracts”
• In determining whether an arbitration clause was broad, the court noted that the difference in the phrases “in connection with” and “may arise out of or in relation to” was largely semantic.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).