Skip to main content
· 4/28/1958

Costin v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.

Citations

  • 140 A.2d 696
  • 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is the further fact that [an individual] was served with process in the action and he never appeared to contest the action or to seek to vacate the confession judgment. We cannot hold that the judgment against him was void.”
  • “There is the further fact that [an individual] was served with process in the action and he never appeared to contest the action or to seek to vacate the confession judgment. We cannot hold that the judgment against him was void.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rover, Chief Judge, and Hood and Quinn, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.