Skip to main content
· 4/17/1991

Coster v. Crookham

Citations

  • 468 N.W.2d 802
  • 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 61
  • 1991 WL 58335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a fiduciary “cannot use [his] position, directly or indirectly, for [his] own advantage or profit”
  • stating a “ ‘trustee violates his duty to the beneficiary ... whére he uses the trust property for his own purposes’ ” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170 cmt. 1)
  • stating a “‘trustee violates his duty to the beneficiary . . . where he uses the trust property for his own purposes’” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170 cmt. l)
  • punitive damages “are not awarded as a matter of right,” but only to punish the offender and to deter others from conduct which is sufficiently egregious to call for the remedy
  • fiduciary responsibility exists notwithstanding the fact that no appointment was made by a court
  • adopting the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 170

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Larson, Schultz, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.