· 2/27/2002
Costco Companies, Inc. v. Gallant
Citations
- 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 344
- 96 Cal. App. 4th 740
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1971
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2399
- 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 2203
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Costco’s “time, place, and manner” restrictions were “narrowly tailored” to its “substantial interests in the smooth operation of its stores” and thus, valid
- Costco stores not “miniature downtowns” because customers go to stores “to purchase ... goods and services offered by Costco,” not “with the expectation they will meet friends, be entertained, dine or congregate”
- affirming restrictions on expressive activity on 34 busiest days
- affirming restric- tions on expressive activity on 34 busiest days
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.