Skip to main content
· 1/26/1993

Costanzo v. Ganguly

Citations

  • 12 Cal. App. 4th 1085
  • 16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 55
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 612
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 1186
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • escrow instructions that community proceeds of a 13 house sale were to be split “50/50” did not expressly declare that the character of the property 14 was being changed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.