Costanza v. Seinfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where “there is no genuine basis either in law or fact, or good-faith argument for a change in the law,” the position is frivolous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Costanza v. Seinfeld
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-01-04· cited 12×
• Kramer v. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.
  New York Supreme Court· 2014-07-14· cited 3×
• Riverstone Associates, LP v. Campbell
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 2016-06-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Howell v. New York Post Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1993-04-05· cited 788×
• Arrington v. New York Times Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-04-07· cited 222×
• Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. 198 Broadway, Inc.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1990-07-10· cited 95×
• Delan v. CBS, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-01-24· cited 25×
• Kane v. Orange County Publications
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-10-21· cited 20×
• Hampton v. Guare
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-13· cited 14×
• Winters v. Gould
  New York Supreme Court· 1989-03-27· cited 14×
• Castel v. Jean Norihiko Sherlock Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-03-06· cited 7×
• Shinn v. Williamson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-03-11· cited 6×