Costabile v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the language providing all-risk coverage was unambiguous, while the language providing coverage against named perils was ambiguous
• \...the Potomac court compared the dictionary definitions of 'arson' and 'vandalism' and concluded that arson is a type of vandalism.\
• “The language of the policy in Coverages A and B is not ambiguous: the willful destruction of property is not covered if the building has been vacant or unoccupied for thirty consecutive days.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).