Costa v. Costa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attorney’s fees award of $6000, amounting to 30 per- cent of $20,000 lump sum alimony award, not including periodic alimony award, was not abuse of discretion where husband had $280,000 in assets, wife had $170,000 in assets, and husband earned $58,400 per year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. Miller
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-27· cited 38×
• Febbroriello v. Febbroriello
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-10· cited 38×
• Panganiban v. Panganiban
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-31· cited 22×
• Damon v. Damon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-04· cited 20×
• Voloshin v. Voloshin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-11-17· cited 13×
• Seder v. Errato
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-03-15· cited 2×
• Hornung v. Hornung
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-09-20
• Monnier v. Monnier
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-05-21

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Town of Brookfield v. Candlewood Shores Estates, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 136×
• Barnes v. Barnes
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-21· cited 91×
• Barco Auto Leasing Corp. v. House
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-20· cited 68×
• Sands v. Sands
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-17· cited 59×
• Holley v. Holley
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 51×
• Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 43×
• Kenny v. Civil Service Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-27· cited 34×