Cospito v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “our jurisdiction does not extend to an agency’s factual and discretionary determinations underlying the denial of waivers based on an analysis involving extreme hardship”
• ruling that a court cannot review an alien’s contentions that the IJ “gave short shrift to crucial evidence” as that is simply a quarrel over the exercise of discretion
• holding that an argument “that the IJ gave ‘short shrift to crucial evidence’ . . . [or] ‘ignored crucial and uncontradicted evidence’ . . . do[es] not 4 raise constitutional claims or questions of law”
• addressing arguments that IJ, inter alia, “gave ‘short shrift to crucial evidence’ ” and “ ‘simply looked at individual factors’ rather than provide an evaluation of the factors in the aggregate”
• addressing arguments that IJ, inter alia, “gave ‘short shrift to crucial evidence’ ” and “ ‘simply looked at individual factors’ rather than provide an evaluation of the factors in the aggregate”
• addressing arguments that IJ, inter alia, “gave ‘short shrift to crucial evidence’ ” and “ ‘simply looked at individual factors’ rather than provide an evaluation of the factors in the aggregate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).