Skip to main content
· 4/12/1961

Coslett v. Hirsch

Citations

  • 128 So. 2d 617
  • 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that -5- J-S56005-20 this Court is not bound by the rationale of the PCRA court and may affirm on any basis
  • holding that this Court is not bound by rationale of PCRA court and may affirm on any basis
  • holding that this Court is not bound by the rationale of the trial court, and may affirm the trial court’s order on any basis
  • holding that this Court is not bound by the rationale of the PCRA court and may affirm on any basis
  • holding that this Court is not bound by the rationale of the PCRA court and may affirm on any basis
  • holding that this Court is not bound by the rationale of the PCRA court and may affirm on any basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Germany, John, Kanner, Shannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.