· 2/19/1992
Coskey's TV & Radio Sales v. Foti
Citations
- 602 A.2d 789
- 253 N.J. Super. 626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “What * * * [the employee] brought to his employer, he should be able to take away.”
- blue penciling a restrictive covenant that had \devastating effects\ on the employee and \only limited\ effects on the employer to permit \substantially narrower enforcement\
- “What * * * [the employee] brought to his employer, he should be able to take away.”
- blue penciling a restrictive covenant that had “devastating effects” on the employee and “only limited” effects on the employer to permit “substantially narrower enforcement”
- further limiting the scope of a non-compete covenant - after trial court had trimmed the covenant’s scope - upon review of the trial court’s preliminary injunction order
- “Foti worked on hundreds of proposals which resulted in unsuccessful bids. Such efforts were part of the everyday work not only of plaintiff, but also of all its competitors, and it was unfair to make such contacts the triggering actions to warrant injunctive relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges King, Dreier and Brochin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.