Cosgrove v. Lawrence

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s holding that consensual sexual relationship between a therapist and patient did not fall within scope of employment
• employer not vicariously liable for its therapist employee's sexual assault of a patient, because the act of sexual relations was outside the scope of the therapist's employment
• therapist’s act of sex with patient was not motivated by desire to serve hospital
• therapist's act of sex with patient was not motivated by desire to serve hospital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).