· 10/7/2003
Cosgrove Distributors, Inc. v. Haff
Citations
- 798 N.E.2d 139
- 343 Ill. App. 3d 426
- 278 Ill. Dec. 292
- 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
- discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
- discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
- a court can pierce the corporate veil and hold shareholders of corporation individually liable where (1) a unity of interests and ownership exists and (2) piercing is required to avoid fraud, injustice, or inequitable consequences
- a court can pierce the corporate veil and hold shareholders of corporation individually liable where (1) a unity of interests and ownership exists and (2) piercing is required to avoid fraud, injustice, or inequitable consequences
- “Courts are reluctant to pierce the corporate veil.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holdridge, McDADE, Slater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.