Skip to main content
· 10/7/2003

Cosgrove Distributors, Inc. v. Haff

Citations

  • 798 N.E.2d 139
  • 343 Ill. App. 3d 426
  • 278 Ill. Dec. 292
  • 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
  • discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
  • discussing the factors courts use to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil
  • a court can pierce the corporate veil and hold shareholders of corporation individually liable where (1) a unity of interests and ownership exists and (2) piercing is required to avoid fraud, injustice, or inequitable consequences
  • a court can pierce the corporate veil and hold shareholders of corporation individually liable where (1) a unity of interests and ownership exists and (2) piercing is required to avoid fraud, injustice, or inequitable consequences
  • “Courts are reluctant to pierce the corporate veil.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holdridge, McDADE, Slater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.