Skip to main content
· 11/24/1993

Cosgriffe v. Cosgriffe

Citations

  • 864 P.2d 776
  • 262 Mont. 175
  • 50 State Rptr. 1501
  • 1993 Mont. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the legislature may “extend the statute of limitations and apply it retroactively to reverse barred claims” because “[t]here are no constitutional or statutory obstacles to legislative enactments of statutes relating to remedies that are retroactive in operation”
  • applying federal due process analysis and concluding that “Montana due process is not violated by the retroactive application of the statute” reviving expired civil tort claims of childhood sexual abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison, Turnage, Gray, Hunt, Trieweiler, Nelson, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.