Cosentino v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court narrowly tailored its actions by excluding only those whom it had admonished for disruptive behavior but who had failed to heed the admonition
• holding that trial court adequately considered alternative to exclusion of spectators when trial court admonished gallery not to disrupt proceeding, disruption occurred in spite of admonition, and trial court excluded from second trial only those who had created the disruption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).