Cosden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reasonable jury could conclude that defendant was recklessly or maliciously ignoring the plaintiffs signs of methadone withdrawal
• concluding that delirium and other symptoms of a forced withdrawal from methadone created a serious medical need
• holding that a reasonable jury could conclude that defendant was recklessly or maliciously ignoring the plaintiff’s signs of methadone withdrawal
• concluding that a prisoner suffer- ing from opioid withdrawals that caused him to hallucinate and defecate on the floor of his cell had objectively serious medical needs
• holding that “forced withdrawal from methadone” constituted a “serious medical need”
• holding that “forced withdrawal from methadone” constituted a “serious medical need”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).