Cosby v. Slaughters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that language similar to Unum’s policy here justified de novo review
• permitting “additional discovery” where the plaintiff’s “allegations are sufficiently specific to suggest that [the defendant’s] conflict may have affected its decision on [the plaintiff’s] claim”
• “[W]hile Prudential contends that Durham’s allegations are belied by the administrative record, the portions of the record Prudential cites do not clearly show the absence of a reasonable chance that Prudential's conflict affected its decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).