Cosby v. Lynn's heirs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “speculation as to what a third party may conceivably someday claim, in the underlying litigation, … is insufficient to satisfy [an insured’s] burden to prove coverage”
• explaining that in interpreting contracts, including insurance contracts, absurd results should be avoided
• explaining that in interpreting-contracts, including insurance contracts, absurd results should be avoided
• where “there are facts among those stipulated by the parties to generate] a triable issue,” “[t]here is sufficient evidence within the record to prevent a grant of summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).