Cosby v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not unreasonable for the source selection official to normalize costs where the solicitation warned bidders of cost normalization
• stating that the administrative record is “something of a fiction” because \the agency has to exercise some judgment in furnishing the court with the relevant documents\
• noting that the court had “a choice about the degree of relevance to assign to” postdecisional documents included in an administrative record
• rejecting similar assertion in protest based on agency’s alleged non-compliance with statutory preference for multiple awards of advisory and assistance contracts, 41 U.S.C. § 253i (1994)
• “[T]he primary focus of the court’s review should be the materials that were before the agency when it made its final decision.”
• “[T]he primary focus of the court’s review should be the materials that were before the agency when it made its final decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).