Cory Wayne Ferguson v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the substantial consummation factor weighed against equitable mootness, despite the fact that the plan satisfied the Bankruptcy Code definition, because the relief sought \does not undermine the Plan's foundation\
• holding that the substantial consummation factor weighed against equitable mootness, despite the fact that the plan satisfied the Bankruptcy Code definition, because the relief sought “does not undermine the Plan’s foundation”
• holding that the substantial consummation factor weighed against equitable mootness, despite the fact that the plan satisfied the Bankruptcy Code definition, because the relief sought “does not undermine the Plan’s foundation”
• noting that failure to seek a stay weighed against appellant, but “because the remedy [appellant] seeks does not undermine the Plan’s foundation, this omission is not fatal”
• explaining that non-consensual releases must be given in exchange for fair consideration, among other things
• finding that a court’s approval of a professional’s retention is, in itself, a final order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).