Corwine v. Crow Wing County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that individuals challenging CUPs have the burden “to establish the alleged failures [of the proposal to meet county standards] and show an abuse of discretion”
• stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to obtain reversal
• stating that appellant must show both error and prejudice to obtain reversal
• noting status as area residents is sufficient “to establish competency and personal knowledge” of many alleged facts
• denying summary judgment for landowner, but singularly because the county showed a genuine issue on one of two grounds stated for its decision
• “When a use permit is approved, the decision-making body is always implicitly giving the same reason - all requirements for the issuance of the permit have been met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).