Skip to main content

Corwin v. DaimlerChrysler Insurance

Citations

  • 296 Mich. App. 242
  • 819 N.W.2d 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “ ‘PIP coverage protects the person, not the motor vehicle’ ”
  • noting the ability of a court to reform an insurance policy to be \compatible with the existing public policy as reflected in the no-fault act\
  • invalidating and reforming an insurance policy because it contravened the no-fault act
  • “A policy is void when there is not an insurable interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beckering, Borrello, Gleicher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.