Skip to main content
· 5/12/1986

Corwin Jeep Sales & Service, Inc. v. American Motors Sales Corp.

Citations

  • 670 F. Supp. 591
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \this court cannot find to a legal certainty that the parties1 respective rights under the franchise agreement are worth less than [the jurisdictional amount]\
  • \this court cannot find to a legal certainty that the parties' respective rights under the franchise agreement are worth less than [the jurisdictional amount]\
  • when removability contested by timely motion to remand the district court has obligation to make a factual inquiry into that issue
  • once removal is contested via remand motion, district court obligated to review the issue of whether it has jurisdiction
  • amount in controversy is measured by the pecuniary value of the rights litigated
  • state’s interest in implementation of its regulatory mechanism was not at stake in contract dispute between parties since “Pennsylvania ha[d] no greater interest in this matter than it does in the resolution of any other private dispute between individuals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rambo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.