Skip to main content
· 4/9/1998

Cortinez v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct

Citations

  • 332 Ark. 456
  • 966 S.W.2d 251
  • 1998 Ark. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Conviction of loitering or prowling was authorized where the suspect’s explanation to a law enforcement officer failed to account for his possession of a flashlight and thick wool gloves on a warm day.
  • evidence was sufficient to support loitering and prowling conviction when the defendant was discovered outside of the victim’s apartment in the dark with items that could be used for a burglary, and he had unlatched and opened a screen door

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.