Skip to main content

Cortez v. State

Citations

  • 24 Tex. Ct. App. 511
  • 6 S.W. 546
  • 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 233

Syllabus

<p>Theft—Conspiracy—Evidence.—It is a general rule of evidence that the acts or declarations of a conspirator will not be admitted in evidence against his co-conspirator unless they were done or made pending the conspiracy, and were in furtherance of the common design. See the opinion in extenso on the question, and for a case in which the declarations of a co-conspirator were, under the rule announced, improperly admitted against the accused.</p>

Judges: Hurt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.