Skip to main content
· 3/18/1996

Cortez v. MTD Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 927 F. Supp. 386
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10224
  • 1996 WL 280562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “there is no apparent difference, for purposes of measuring preemptive reach, between a ‘requirement or prohibition . . . based on State law,’ on the one hand, and ... a ‘standard or regulation’ established by a State”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.