Skip to main content
· 8/4/1981

Cortez Development Co. v. New York Capital Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 401 So. 2d 1163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • certified letter sent to defendant but returned marked “refused” together with evidence that defendant lived at address to which letter was sent supported inference that return of the letter was chargeable to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, C.J., and Barkdull and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.