Cortez Cardona v. Yates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration where petitioner had not shown she was a member of her own proposed PSGs
• holding that the petitioner failed to exhaust her claim based on a proposed particular social group that differed from the proposed groups raised before the Board
• holding that the evidence supported the Board’s finding that a Guatemalan woman had never been in a “domestic relationship” with a male individual even though the two had dated for several months
• finding that the record supported the BIA's determination that petitioner \had not demonstrated factually that she fit within her own proposed social groups\
• recognizing that \unpublished BIA decisions carry no precedential value\
• describing the “ongoing debate about the scope of . . . A-R-C-G-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).