Cortes v. ALN Restaurant, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “instructing the jury as to the applicable law is the distinct and exclusive province of the court” (quoting Hangarter v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 373 F.3d 998, 1016 (9th Cir. 2004))
• “[T]he elements of a valid Title II claim do 14 not differ in any material sense from those of a valid section 504 claim and the two may be 15 addressed together.”
• “We draw all justifiable factual inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, and we reverse an order granting summary judgment if any rational trier of fact could resolve a material factual issue in favor of the nonmoving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).