Corsair Asset Management, Inc. v. Moskovitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[p]recluding testimony from an expert under [Rule 37(c)(1)] is a drastic remedy and should only be applied in cases where the party’s conduct represents flagrant bad faith and callous disregard of the federal rules”
• disagreeing with \other cases denying an expert compensation for time spent preparing for the deposition\
• allowing recovery of expert’s reasonable fees for time spent preparing for depositions
• “W]hen a [party] . . . is aware of the existence of documents before the discovery cutoff date and issues discovery requests including subpoenas after the discovery deadline has passed, then the subpoenas and discovery requests should be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).