Skip to main content
· 1/31/1989

Corrugated Paper Products, Inc. v. Longview Fibre Co.

Citations

  • 868 F.2d 908
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309
  • 1989 WL 16209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a court must be circumspect in granting summary judgment based solely on the defendant’s categorical denial that the requisite mental state existed”
  • “[T]he opposing party may not merely recite the incantation, ‘Credibility,’ and have a trial on the hope that a jury may disbelieve factually uncontested proof.”
  • “[T]he nonmovant ordinarily must identify specific factual inconsistencies in the witness’ testimony in order to withstand a motion for summary judgment.”
  • “It is well-settled that summary judgment may be granted where the controlling issue is whether or not the movant acted with a particular mental state.”
  • discussing New Jersey law and third-party beneficiary law in general
  • “[W]here the defendant’s motive or state of mind is an essential element of a plaintiff’s case, a court must be circumspect in granting summary judgment based solely on the defendant’s categorical denial that the requisite mental state existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Cudahy, Pell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.