Corrpro Companies, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that targeting did not exist where the minority-preferred minority candidate prevailed over white opponents 47% of the time
• finding that 47% success rate was \no reason to find that blacks' preferred black candidates have `usually' been defeated.\
• noting that the electoral history for the public offices at issue demonstrated that \47 percent of blacks' preferred black candidates were elected\ and thus there was \no reason to find that blacks' preferred black candidates have 'usually' been defeated\ under Gingles
• noting that the electoral history for the public offices at issue demonstrated that \47 percent of blacks' preferred black candidates were elected\ and thus there was \no reason to find that blacks' preferred black candidates have 'usually' been defeated\ under Gingles
• noting that the electoral history for the public offices at issue demonstrated that \47 percent of blacks' preferred black candidates were elected\ and thus there was \no reason to find that blacks' preferred black candidates have 'usually' been defeated\ under Gingles
• considering \cause\ of the success rate of black-preferred candidates in assessing third Gingles element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).