Corrigan v. Palkoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming admission of evidence of appellant’s past abusive conduct against a romantic partner where appellant claimed victim’s death was accidental
• affirming aggravated sexual battery conviction where victim told defendant “no” and that she “did not like it”
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting extrinsic-acts evidence pursuant to Rule 413
• “Any prejudicial impact of the extrinsic acts evidence was mitigated when the trial court gave the jury specific instructions about the limited purpose of the evidence.”
• “Any prejudicial impact of the extrinsic acts evidence was mitigated when the trial court gave the jury specific instructions about the limited purpose of the evidence.”
• “Any prejudicial impact of the extrinsic acts evidence was mitigated when the trial court gave the jury specific instructions about the limited purpose of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).