Skip to main content
· 1/25/2017

Corrielus v. State

Citations

  • 222 So. 3d 1218
  • 2017 WL 361935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declaring that an argument was proper in a DWI case when the prosecutor ―urged the jury to consider the seriousness of drunken driving because of the inherent danger arising therefrom, and the needless loss of life‖
  • declaring that an argument was proper in a DWI case when the prosecutor “urged the jury to consider the seriousness of drunken driving because of the inherent danger arising therefrom, and the needless loss of life”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.