Skip to main content
· 9/17/2007

Corrie Ex Rel. Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc.

Citations

  • 503 F.3d 974
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22133
  • 2007 WL 2694701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that courts treat a motion attacking the substance of a complaint’s jurisdictional allegations as a Rule 12(b)(1) motion
  • concluding that a case was constitutionally committed to another branch where 12 the executive branch financed the conduct that the plaintiffs sought to challenge
  • explaining that the political question doctrine bars jurisdiction where the case would \at least implicitly\ require the court to pass judgment on United States foreign policy
  • explaining that the political question doctrine bars jurisdiction where the case would “at least implicitly” require the court to pass judgment on United States foreign policy
  • stating that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear a case presenting a political question
  • explaining that a 6 court may take judicial notice of a government publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Hawkins, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.