California Court of Appeal· 5/8/1961
Correia v. Santos
Citations
- 191 Cal. App. 2d 844
- 13 Cal. Rptr. 132
- 1961 Cal. App. LEXIS 2132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement describing plaintiff as a person who was unreasonable in his actions andJiis demandsmot defamatory
- statement made “not to describe the plaintiff as a person who was mentally ill but as one who was unreasonable in his actions and his demands”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coughlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bratt v. International Business MacHines Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-07-16· cited 228×
- Sanborn v. Chronicle Publishing Co.California Supreme Court· 1976-12-03· cited 113×
- Polygram Records, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-07-24· cited 61×
- Gomes v. FriedCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-10-01· cited 46×
- Douglas v. JanisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-12-16· cited 35×
- Albertini v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-10-18· cited 35×
- Yorty v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-12-15· cited 27×
- Nethercutt Collection v. RegaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-03-19· cited 20×
- Hoesl v. United StatesN.D. California· 1978-04-26· cited 19×
- Eberle v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-02-19· cited 18×
- Stoneking v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-21· cited 3×
- Reese v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMSE.D. California· 2008-12-15· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court· 1959-08-03· cited 182×
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-04-07· cited 97×
- Locke v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-10-29· cited 47×
- Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-03-05· cited 46×
- Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-12-20· cited 39×
- Rosenberg v. J. C. Penney Co.California Court of Appeal· 1939-01-31· cited 39×
- Tonini v. CevascoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-09-17· cited 36×
- Bettner v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-07-28· cited 31×
- Shook v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-09-07· cited 18×
- Semple v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-06-22· cited 16×
- Rea v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-31· cited 4×
- Larive v. WillittCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-10-01· cited 2×
- Doherty v. LynettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania· 1907-09-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.